Legal Opinion
Palevsky v. Bentfield
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1933No. 13250PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By McGILL, J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff in error Palevsky, who was plaintiff below, that Bentfield not having vacated the premises by midnight of September 30th is bound, at the election of the plaintiff, for the October rental.
It was urged by the defendant Bentfield, that his rental was paid for the entire month of September, 1933, and that this gave him a right to move on October first in order to have the benefit of the full month of September.
The first question presented relates to the time when the tenant’s lease expired.
In the case of Dennis v Coble et, 18 Oh Ap (1923)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ultimate Salon & Spa, Inc. v. Legends Const. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Village Station Associates v. Geauga Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- K&D Mgt., L.L.C. v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- The Strip Delaware v. Landry's Restaurant, Inc., 2008ca00146 (3-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- The Strip Delaware v. Landry's Restaurants, 2008ca00146 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009