Grant v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit, Court for Ashland County, The case is stated in. the opinion. They cited Kollooh v. Poacher, 52 Wis. 393; Hendrioh v. Lindsay, 93 U. S. 143; Norwood v. Pe Hart, 30 N. J. Eq. 412; Vroo-mcm v. Twner, 69 N. Y. 280; Merriman v. Moore, 90 Pa. St. 81; Olodfelter
1Opinion of the Court
ObtoN, J\
The plaintiff is the assignee of his partner’s interest in the contract, and therefore I will speak of him as the contracting party. The plaintiff entered into a written contract with Ashland county to build a county jail, so far as the wood-work and masonry were concerned, September 1,1881, in which it was agreed that the county of Ashland should not be liable in any manner for or on account of any damage or delay by any other contractor on said building, but the plaintiff should look solely and exclusively to said other contractor for remuneration for any such damage caused by such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Putney v. FarnhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Bassett v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Kollock v. ParcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- McDowell v. LaevWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Kimball v. NoyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kuhl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Enos v. SangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Morgan v. South Milwaukee Lake View Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Stites v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Fish v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.