Legal Opinion

People v. Gold Coast Cadillac

Justice Court of Village of Roslyn Harbor

Decided September 12, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David H. Pfeffer, J.

On June 19, 1989, in open court, defendant Gold Coast Cadillac pleaded guilty to separate charges of violating, respectively, section 6 (c) and (d) of the "Paddison Motors Ordinance” of the Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor. The section 6 (c) violation related to a violation dealing with signs *180permitted on the premises, and the section 6 (d) violation related to a violation of that portion of the ordinance which designated specific hours of permitted operation. As part of the guilty plea, the defendant acknowledged being convicted in this court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Village of Southampton v. PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. Multari, New York County Courts1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API