Legal Opinion

Rudolf Sienega v. State of California Ftb

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 2021No. 20-60047Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE RUDOLF P. SIENEGA, No. 20-60047 Debtor, BAP No. 19-1334 RUDOLF P. SIENEGA, Appellant, OPINION v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Faris, Lafferty III, and Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 17, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed December 6, 2021 2 IN RE SIENEGA Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Donald W. Molloy,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Thomas SUMMARY** Bankruptcy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. In Re: James H. Hatton Debtor. United States of America v. James H. HattonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re: Marion Dale Jackson Patricia L. Jackson, Debtors. California Franchise Tax Board v. Marion Dale Jackson Patricia L. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. State of Maryland v. CiottiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API