Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lacy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 19, 1965No. 20916Published

1DissentJustice Sutton

I respectfully dissent.

What we have here is a buy and sell agreement of a type often used in business represented by a revolving stock repurchase plan funded by life insurance.

Lacy’s type of restricted ownership of the revolving stock in question and bis indicia of ownership in the insurance policies, if any, are governed as to the stock by both the Trust Agreement and the Articles of Incorporation, and as to the insurance, by the Trust Agreement only.

I will not set out in detail the many limitations imposed on the stock, for it is enough to point out that its transfer or sale was highly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. People Ex Rel. IrelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Mitchell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  3. Dobrzensky v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API