Legal Opinion

Bloomfield Steamship Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 22, 1959No. Docket No. 64074PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Black, Judge;

The first issue here presented arises under section

23(a) (1) (A) of the 1939 Code.1 Petitioner contends that the expenditures made to repair the vessels it purchased from the Maritime Administration, so as to place the vessels in class, that is, in seaworthy and cargoworthy condition, are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. The respondent contends that deduction of these expenses as ordinary and necessary business expenses is banned by section 24(a) (2) of the 1939 Code.2 Regulations 111, section 29.23 (a)-4,3 define repairs, the cost of which is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Merchants Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  2. Joseph Merrick Jones and Eugenie Penick Jones v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. M. A. Stoeltzing and Margaret M. Stoeltzing, His Wife v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. L. A. Wells Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. W. J. Wehrli and Helen B. WehrliCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. Gaddy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Jaffa v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961
  5. Bank of Houston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API