Legal Opinion

Neumann v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 5, 1979No. 77-524PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming the trial Court, which held that Plaintiffs/Appellants were not entitled to recover under a Homeowner’s Policy from Defendant/Appellee, State'Farm Fire & Casualty Company, for the loss of their personal property. At the time of its total destruction, the “unscheduled personal property [was in transit] away from the premises.” We reverse and remand.

The pertinent policy language, under the heading, “Description of Property and Interests Covered”, reads:

“COVERAGE B — UNSCHEDULED PERSONAL PROPERTY…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Olguin v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Tyler v. Insurance Company of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Canal Insurance Company v. StidhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Georgia Casualty & Surety Company, a Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Percy v. Safeguard Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Neumann v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API