Neumann v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming the trial Court, which held that Plaintiffs/Appellants were not entitled to recover under a Homeowner’s Policy from Defendant/Appellee, State'Farm Fire & Casualty Company, for the loss of their personal property. At the time of its total destruction, the “unscheduled personal property [was in transit] away from the premises.” We reverse and remand.
The pertinent policy language, under the heading, “Description of Property and Interests Covered”, reads:
“COVERAGE B — UNSCHEDULED PERSONAL PROPERTY…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Olguin v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Tyler v. Insurance Company of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Canal Insurance Company v. StidhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Company, a Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Percy v. Safeguard Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Neumann v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979