Archibald McNeil & Sons Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
A ruling in this cause was deferred, awaiting- the submission of briefs, which wore unavoidably delayed. They have now been submitted. A jury trial was in this ease waived by the parties. The facts are not in controversy, but they are unique. The question of law raised is one which arises out of ihese facts, and in consequence is also, in some respects, sui generis. We have thus qualified the latter statement, because the question of law in the view of the resourceful counsel for Ihe plaintiff is one to which the familiar doctrine of the law of accord and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Textile MacHine Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg & Dampskibsselskabet Af 1912 Artieselskab v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955