Legal Opinion

Baker v. Railsback

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit . upon a promissory note executed

by Railsback to one Strang, and by him assigned to the plaintiff, Baker.

The defendant pleaded, as to the sum of 200 dollars, part of the sum called for by the note, that said note was given for the last payment on a lot of ground purchased by said Railsback of said Strang for the price of 1,400 dollars, 1,100 dollars of which were paid in hand, and said note given for the residue, 300 dollars; that said Strang executed to said Railsback, on the purchase, a warranty deed, covenanting that said land was free from all incumbrance, &c., when, in fact, it…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whisler v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Doremus v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Foster v. KlingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Harper v. DotsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API