Legal Opinion

Knowlton v. Hersey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 30, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On report. Writ of review. Original judgment was rendered on default at the December term, 1881, of the superior court, Cumberland county, for $83.83 with interest from the date of writ, making $87.45 debt and $31.90 costs of suit.

Read the full summary

On report. Writ of review. Original judgment was rendered on default at the December term, 1881, of the superior court, Cumberland county, for $83.83 with interest from the date of writ, making $87.45 debt and $31.90 costs of suit. The opinion states the material facts. cited: Monk v. Beal, 2 Allen, 585 ; Glidden v. Child, 122 Mass. 433; Chapin v. Lapham, 20 Pick. 467 ; Massey v. Rayner, 22 Pick. 230; Sylvester v. Staples, 44 Maine, 496; Richardson v. Insurance Co. 46 Maine, 398; Cocheco Bank v. Berry, 52 Maine, 302; Hawes v. Smith, 12 Maine, 429. contended that the contract of Knowlton was…

1Opinion of the CourtWalton, J.

On the 25th of February, 1880, Alfred Knowlton of Liberty, Maine, wrote a letter to E. C. Hersey & Co. of Portland, of the following tenor.

" Gentlemen: The bearer of this letter, my son-in-law, Mr. Arthur Young, wishes to place a stock of groceries in his provision and meat store in this place. To enable him to do this, I am willing to be responsible to you for the amount of groceries he may order of you.”

The question is whether or not this letter created a continuing-liability. • It appears that Mr. Young went with it to Hersey & Co., selected groceries to the amount of $432.45; for which…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Presbyterian Board of Publication & Sabbath-School Work v. GillifordIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. The S. Hamill Co. v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. StokerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API