Sayles v. Greater Gadsden Housing Authority

My review of this record discloses no reversible error in the trial court’s application of the law to the facts in this case. Because I would affirm the trial court’s order evicting Sayles for repeated violations of the terms of the lease agreement, I must respectfully dissent.

It is undisputed that this is not the first time that Sayles has violated the terms of the lease provision regarding utility service. In pertinent part, that provision expressly states: “Failure of Tenant to furnish UNINTERRUPTED service because of non-payment of utilities shall be considered a serious violation of the…