Legal Opinion

Guzzo v. Kosches

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The only authority of defendant’s employee was to attend with the marshal and identify the goods mentioned in the writ of replevin. The alleged assault and battery committed by him was committed without the scope of his authority. (Muller v. Hillenbrand, 227 N. Y. 448; Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co., Inc., 217 App. Div. 487; Feneran v. Singer Mfg. Co., 20 id. 574; McGrath v. Michaels, 80 id. 458; Weinstein v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 121 id. 708.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muller v. . HillenbrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926