People v. Hernandez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.—
In Eleazer v. Superior Court (1970) 1 Cal.3d 847 [83 Cal.Rptr. 586, 464 P.2d 42], the California Supreme Court held that due *410process requires that the police or prosecuting authority “make such inquiries and arrangements- as are reasonably necessary to enable the prosecution and defense to locate [an informer who is a material witness whose testimony might be helpful to the defense].” (1 Cal.3d at pp. 852-853.) In People v. Goliday (1973) 8 Cal.3d 771 [106 Cal.Rptr. 113, 505 P.2d 537], the high court ruled that this duty applies in the situation of informers who serve “as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Eleazer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. GolidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bellizzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Parks v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. GuerecaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987