Legal Opinion

Rich v. Conley

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Flora S. Rich and others against James A. Conley to recover damages and a penalty tor a wrongful delivery of property replevied.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This action was brought, under section 2928, Code Civ. Proc., to recover a penalty of $100, and also the value of- certain personal property, as damages for its nondelivery to the plaintiffs by the defendant in this action under a levy made by the defendant for one Eugene Sherman, plaintiff in an action of claim and delivery. The usual undertaking was duly given, executed by sureties, in an action brought in the city court of the city of Elmira. The defendants in that action, who are the present plaintiffs, through their attorney, excepted to the sureties on said undertaking. On the return…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Commerce Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Bell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Corn Exchange Bank v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Bell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rushbrook v. Mead, New York County Courts1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API