Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hertz Lease Plan, Inc. v. Urban Transportation & Planning Associates, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1977No. 7866Published

1DissentRedmann, Judge

The current practice of “leasing” equipment needed for one’s business brings many obvious benefits. The “lessee” conserves available capital (or borrowing power) and (at least in a true lease) may find rental more advantageous than depreciation as a deduction for income tax purposes. The “lessor” may make more profit from “rental” than he would have from interest on a loan, and may find equipment ownership a more attractive security device than chattel mortgage.

But leasing is not a thornless rose. A lessee may find that, despite having paid rentals totalling more than the full price of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. EXECUTIVE CAR LEASING COMPANY OF NEW ORLEANS, INC. v. Alodex CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Tac Amusement Co. v. HenryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Carbo v. Maison Jolie, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Skrmetta v. State ex rel. Department of InstitutionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API