Legal Opinion
Cherry Valley Associates v. Stroud Township Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1989No. Appeal No. 1064 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Cherry Valley Associates (CVA) appeals from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) which affirmed the decision of the Board of Supervisors of Stroud Township (Board) denying CVA’s request for preliminary approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a conditional use permit for such development. CVA also appeals the portion of the trial court’s decision which remanded to the Board, for review, the Board’s denial of CVA’s revised applications for approval of a PUD.
CVA, a partnership of Gene Paul Percudani and Vintage Homes, Inc.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Goodman v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Croft v. Board of Supervisors of Middletown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Municipality of Bethel Park AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- BD. OF SUPV., GREENE T. v. KuhlCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berryman v. Wyoming Borough Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Busse v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Baker v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Berryman v. WYOMING BOROUGH ZON. HEAR. BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Busse v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.