Legal Opinion · Dissent

January v. Masoumeh-Parivash

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1990No. CA 90-246Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

The majority of this court, without written opinion, has today granted a motion allowing a belated brief to be filed on behalf of the appellee in this case. I dissent because (1) the motion filed by an attorney who I believe is not authorized to represent the appellee, but even if he is, (2) his motion clearly shows that there is no good, valid, or equitable reason to allow his brief to be filed late.

An affidavit by the attorney, filed in support of his motion, states:

Our law firm was retained on approximately March 22, 1990, by Employers Mutual Insurance Company, which had posted a $13,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Bank of Quitman v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Morse Bros. Lumber Co. v. F. Burkart Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API