Legal Opinion

Skrepnek v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1994No. C14-93-01155-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. (Shear-son) $33,566.77 plus interest and attorneys’ fees against Panterra Resources, Inc. (PRI), Ray Sandoval (Sandoval), and appellant, Douglas Skrepnek (Skrepnek). In two points of error, Skrepnek asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support the award. We affirm.

Thomas Saunders, a Shearson stockbroker, telephoned Michael Sprouse, PRI vice-president, to solicit business. Sprouse informed Saunders that Ray Sandoval handled PRI’s investments and that Sandoval would return his call. Soon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. In Re Arthur Andersen LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Schlager v. Clements, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. In Re Trammell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API