Legal Opinion

Logan v. Cross

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Crook: T. E. J. Duffy, Judge. In Banc. Action by A. M. Logan and another, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Logan Bros., against R. B. Cross. Judgment for the plaintiffs, defendant appeals, and plaintiffs move to dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed, and judgment affirmed.

1Per curiam

1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for want of a sufficient undertaking. The plaintiffs on March 18, 1920, recovered a judgment against defendant for the sum of $535.00, and $93.30, costs. On May 8,1920, defendant filed and served his notice of appeal' with an undertaking sufficient in form and amount, signed by C. E. Cross as surety, the affidavit of the surety being dated March 29, 1920. Thereafter and in due time the plaintiffs filed their exception to the sufficiency of the surety, whereupon, without appearing before the court or clerk thereof, he was examined before a notary upon…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brandley v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Rogers v. Day & United Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API