In re C.A.W.

DIETZ, Judge.

Respondent appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her minor child Corey.1 She argues that the trial court abused its discretion in its best interests analysis because the court discounted the willingness of Respondent's relatives to care for the child.

The record and the trial court's findings indicate that the court carefully considered this factor. But the court ultimately found that placement with Corey's foster mother, who already had adopted Corey's sister and was willing to adopt Corey, persuaded the trial court that termination of Respondent's parental…