Legal Opinion

Lee v. O'Malley

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ae plication for an injunction to restrain tbe enforcement of chapter 348 of tbe Laws of 1910. The action has been discontinued as against the defendant Baker since argument.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

This is .an application for an injunction against the officials of the State and city to restrain the enforcement of Laws 1910, chapter 348, being -an -amendment to the General Business Law in relation to private banking.

This act provides that no person shall engage in the business of “ receiving deposits of money for safekeeping or for the purpose of transmission to another, or for any other purpose,” without having theretofore procured a license. § 25. The transaction of business without such license or in violation of any of the' provisions of the act is made a misdemeanor. §§ 27, 29f.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Savings & Commercial Bank v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Buffalo Gravel Corp. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Lee v. O'MalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API