Legal Opinion

Tibbs v. Tibbs

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1966No. 3929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge:

After twenty-five years of marriage, the parties were separated in February 1965. Appellee-wife sued for separate maintenance and was awarded a judgment of eighty dollars per month. This appeal followed.

The basic controversy before us centers around the interpretation of McEachnie v. McEachnie, D.C.App., 216 A.2d 169 (1966), decided after the trial court’s decision in the instant case. We there held that certain primary factors have to be considered and evaluated in determining whether to award alimony (and by analogy, maintenance), and the amount of any such award,

“such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McEachnie v. McEachnieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Foley v. FoleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Atkinson v. AtkinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API