Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Peterson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1985No. 3-85-0279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HEIPLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Constance .Bartman, a/k/a Constance Peterson, filed a petition for a rule to show cause, alleging that her ex-husband, Glenn Peterson, was in arrears on his child support obligation. The trial court entered judgment for the amount of the arrearage and ordered Glenn to pay $150 in attorney fees to Constance. Constance appeals the amount of the fees, while Glenn cross-appeals the awarding of any fees.

Under the Peterson’s 1981 judgment of dissolution, Glenn was obligated to pay $100 weekly towards the support of the parties’ minor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of DonahoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Fogliano v. FoglianoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. In Re Marriage of ChenowethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of DodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API