Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Norfolk v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1937Published

1DissentSpratley, J.

The city of Norfolk in its municipal capacity owns and operates a waterworks system. It claims, and it is not contradicted, that its primary and dominant purpose in acquiring this system was to supply water to itself and its inhabitants. In doing this, in addition to the lands acquired in several suw rounding counties, including Nansemond county, it took over two other water companies in its vicinity. It has since then supplied the communities formerly served by these companies and the communities and citizens along its pipe lines, several federal reservations, numerous public carriers, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stiles v. Village of NewportSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  2. Village of Hardwick v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. People Ex Rel. City of Amsterdam v. . HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Mayor of Knoxville v. Park CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Newport News v. Warwick CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API