Schenk v. State

Randall K. Schenk appeals the trial court’s restitution order requiring him to pay $10,323 for damages resulting from him committing the offense of grand theft. He argues that $4935 of the restitution award was determined based on inadmissible hearsay, and therefore, the trial court’s order was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Except for the amount awarded for an electronic tablet, we affirm.

Cindie Schenk reported to the police that her son, Randall Schenk, had stolen 14 pieces of jewelry and an electronic tablet from her home. Schenk was arrested and subsequently entered an…