Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1970No. 53298PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

Defendant appeals from judgment entered pursuant to jury verdict finding him guilty of uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 718.2, Code, 1966, as charged by county attorney’s information. We affirm.

In course of trial Ronald Gerard, a clerk at the Me Too Store in Cedar Rapids, testified to the effect that about 4:30 p. m., April 5, 1968, he cashed two payroll checks purportedly issued by Navajo Freight Lines. One of the checks, exhibit 22, was passed to him by defendant. Shortly after quitting time he was told the checks might be worthless. Two weeks later…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. BesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. HarlessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. State v. FordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. State v. RitchisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. State v. OppedalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API