Legal Opinion
Burkart v. City of Fort Lauderdale
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 9, 1963No. 2273PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
156 So.2d 752 (1963)
Oliver C. BURKART and Mabel C. Burkart, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
No. 2273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
October 9, 1963.
J.B. Patterson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Francis K. Buckley, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Appellants, Oliver R. Burkart and wife, appeal from a final decree, entered after hearings on the merits, dismissing their complaint and denying them the relief sought. Their complaint alleges that they are the owners of two parcels of property in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Brickell v. TrammelSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Benoit v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burkart v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Zwakhals v. SenftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- JOSEPH LEHMANN AND THERESE LEHMANN v. COCOANUT BAYOU ASSOCIATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1990