Legal Opinion

Welzel v. Link-Belt Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1943No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Tbe plaintiff in this action of assumpsit bas appealed from tbe order of tbe court below opening a judgment entered for want of an affidavit of defense against one of tbe defendants, Link-Belt Company.

Tbe opening of a judgment entered by default is a matter within tbe sound discretion of tbe court, sitting as a chancellor, to be disposed of in accordance with principles of equity. For our practice of opening sucb judgments on motion and rule is a substitute for a bill in equity, adopted by Pennsylvania judges when we bad no court of chancery (Mitchell on Motions and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  4. Cochran v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  5. Duffield v. HueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borough of Brookhaven v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Connelly v. Laupheimer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API