Seim's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion
Subsequent to the filing of the opinion in this case, on June 30, 1934, a petition was presented on behalf of Fred Seim, seeking to have the costs placed upon the Borough of Braddock in lieu of petitioner. A rule to show cause why the prayer of the petition should not be granted having issued, the Borough of Braddock filed its answer contending the costs should be apportioned between it and the County of Allegheny. The petition alleges the Act of May 19, 1874, P. L. 208, as amended, provides that where an election contest is successful, as in this case, the costs shall be placed upon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thirty-eighth Ward ElectionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908