Sperling v. Board of Review
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
720 A.2d 607 (1998)
156 N.J. 466
Mark SPERLING, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 28, 1998.
Decided December 11, 1998.
Antranig Aslanian, Jr., Fort Lee, for claimant-appellant (Aslanian & Khorozian, attorneys; Mark Sperling, pro se on the brief).
Andrea R. Grundfest, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-respondent (Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
2Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion of…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Stein; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Stein.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Cafferata v. PeyserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- New Jersey Highway Authority v. RennerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.