National Fire Insurance v. Loomis
New York Court of Chancery
This' case came before the chancellor, upon appeal. The facts are sufficiently stated in his opinion, to understand the only legal questions arising in the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This is an appeal from an order of the vice chancellor of the fifth circuit, denying the application of the appellants, Monroe, Herkimer, Haight and Usher, to set aside the sale to them, under the decree in these .causes. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the vice chancellor, I think there was no fraudulent combination between the agents of the complainants in the first 'of these causes, to raise the property above its real value. One of the standing rules of the court having directed that a provision should be inserted in every decree of sale, of mortgaged premises,…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Haydock v. . StowNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Wooton v. HinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- Banks v. Chas. P. Harris Manuf'g Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
- Bicknell v. ByrnesNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Bowman v. McClenahanNew York Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.