Legal Opinion

Bristol Savings Bank v. Nixon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1929No. 7004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

On October 14, 1904, Mrs. M. A. Joiner, of the first part, executed a deed to “Mrs. Lizzie Nixon and her bodily heirs after her death, . . of the second part,” conveying certain land “unto the said party of the second part, her heirs and assigns.” The habendum clause was as follows: “To have and to hold the said above granted and described property, with all and singular the rights, members, and appurtenances thereunto appertaining, to the only proper use, benefit, and behoof of the said party of the second part, her heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, in fee simple.” The warranty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ewing v. ShropshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. King v. McDuffieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Cooper v. Mitchell Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Thornton v. BurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Goodrich v. PearceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sikes v. MoxleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Trust Co. v. KennySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Rainey v. SpenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Roe v. ReddickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Brooks v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API