Legal Opinion

Roach v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Lane County: Martin L. Pipes, Judge. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of review to examine into the legality of the proceedings of defendant in making certain improvements by grading and graveling a part of Madison Street in the city of Eugene, etc. A return was made to the writ, and a trial had thereon, which resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs declaring such proceedings irregular and void. From this judgment defendant has appealed to this court.

The petition inter alia recites that plaintiffs are owners respectively of separate pieces of property in the city of Eugene, and that defendant by an ordinance declared the cost…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. FurlongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Campbell v. WheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Wilson v. BucknamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McGowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Adams v. Monroe County Quarterly CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estate of Katleman v. KatlemanNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Estate of Katleman v. KatlemanNevada Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API