Barkley v. Tapp
Indiana Supreme Court
From tlie Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This is an action by the appellee to settle partnership accounts between him and William E. Barkley, to recover the amount due upon settlement, and to sot aside as fraudulent a conveyance of land made to George W. Barkley. Counsel presents, in limine, two questions which need but little more consideration than that involved in their mere statement. It is said that the Hendricks Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action. We can not conceive it possible that any one should seriously doubt that a court of general superior jurisdiction, possessing both •chancery and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sherman v. HoglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Dimon v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Rose v. ColterIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Evans v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Stout v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Trentman v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.