Legal Opinion

Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad v. Probate Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Mandamus to compel a probate judge to vacate an order made under How. Stat. § 3340, continuing a railway company in possession pending condemnation proceedings, etc. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Company, in the year 1885, took measures to condemn a crossing through relator’s way, which were conducted in the probate court of Livingston county, resulting in a verdict of nominal damages. These proceedings were removed to this Court, and quashed for various defects and errors, including jurisdictional insufficiency.1 *3Pending that appeal, and without the action of the proper State board to determine the manner and conditions of the crossing, the company seeking to get the condemnation took forcible possession and completed a crossing, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perris v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FraserMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Grand Rapids, Lansing & Detroit Railroad v. ChesebroMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Rodgers v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API