Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Trainor v. Trainor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 2016No. 4D16-852Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partForst, J.

In addition to joining the majority in remanding this case to the trial court to address the reasonableness of the attor*525neys’ fees, I would also reverse the trial court’s decision with respect to the amount of temporary alimony ordered. The record indicates that the husband’s monthly net income was $5184 and his monthly expenses were $3335. Adding a monthly support payment of $2000, plus the installment payment with respect to the $5000 in attorneys’ fees, would put the husband in a deficit situation. Additionally, the .husband argued below that the wife’s expense calculation included living…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bolton v. BoltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Herr v. HerrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Miller v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Sean Moore v. Teresa Kelso-MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Wilder v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API