Legal Opinion
Twin City Hide v. Transamerica Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1984No. C8-84-336PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant Twin City Hide recovery under an “all risk” insurance policy. We affirm.
FACTS
Twin City Hide is a cattle hide tanning factory in South St. Paul. The factory and its contents were insured under an “all risk” insurance policy issued by Trans-america through its agent, Dan Schnee-man.
On February 18, 1982, a water leak was discovered in the factory roof. Twin City Hide notified Transamerica; an adjuster went out to the factory to investigate. The adjuster reported an 8' x 6' corrugated section of the steel roof had rusted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Don Kral Incorporated v. LindstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Haas v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Bettigole v. American Employers InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Boyd Motors, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Shepard v. Keystone InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.