Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Canadian Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1938No. 8793PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment denying recovery in a suit on a policy of automobile liability insurance. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury. The trial court’s special findings of fact, not challenged here, disclose the following situation:

Peter P. Hansen was insured by appellee in respect of liability for injuries to or the death of third persons growing out of the operation of the insured’s car. The policy of insurance contained a provision to the effect that “the company shall not be liable * * * for: * * * Accidents occurring while the automobile *…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Sleeper v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Crowell v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Bankers Indem. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Christensen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Travelers Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
  5. Christensen v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API