Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1917No. 4372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case. Cited cases in Boren v. State, recently decided.

1Opinion of the Court

PEEHDEBGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully gaming, and fined $10.

The trial was before the court without a jury. There is no statement of facts, and but one bill of exceptions.

This bill shows that appellant made a motion to quash the complaint and information, because the complaint upon which the information was based is deficient in this: that it is not signed by affiant, and as there is no valid complaint there is no valid information. The bill further plainly shows that “the court refused to grant said motion but granted the motion of the county attorney asking an order nunc…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Cubine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Compere v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Bogus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Quinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Yohner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API