Legal Opinion

Mills County v. Hammack

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The facts in this case are not in serious dis-. pute. The record discloses that, for many years prior to April 23, 1919, the defendant maintained a 70-foot mill dam across the Nishnabotna River, in Mills County, Iowa. A' county road crosses said stream about 200 feet below and south of the dam, and at this point the county maintained a highway bridge. About 350 feet south of this bridge, the Wabash Railroad Company owns and maintains a steel span bridge across the river, on its line of railroad from Omaha to St. Louis. The natural channel of the Nishnabotna, for a long time prior to 1919, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yockey v. Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. City of Waterloo v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. State v. CloseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Canal Construction Co. v. Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cowin v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API