Doll v. Crooks
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cameron County
1Opinion of the Court
Baird, P. J.,
In the above-entitled interpleader proceedings to determine the ownership of certain goods and chattels levied upon as the property of M. C. Sherwood at the suit of Millard Crooks, and claimed by Lottie Doll, the claimant plaintiff has taken a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
The plaintiff, in her statement of the source of her title, avers that the “right of property” in said goods and chattels “was and still is” in her, and that “she derived title to said goods and chattels by purchase of the same with her own money from the said M. C. Sherwood…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Columbia National Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Wendel v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Anderson v. McHenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Hunter Construction Co. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.