Legal Opinion

Jew Mook ex rel. Jew Wing Lung v. Tillinghast

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 4, 1929No. 2365PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This habeas corpus ease involves the familiar question whether the applicant, a boy bom in December, 1913, is the son of an admittedly nativ.e-bom • citizen. The court below, without opinion, denied the writ, thus, by necessary implication, ruling that the court was without jurisdiction.

We think this decision must be reversed; that the claim’ of paternity is established by the overwhelming weight of the evidence, with no relevant evidence to support the decision.

The applicant, Jew Wing Lung, the alleged father, Jew Mook, and his alleged brother, Jew Hem Sang (admitted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. HangesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Nagle v. Dong MingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Mason Ex Rel. Lee Wing You v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  4. Johnson v. Ng Ling Fong ex rel. Ng Wah SunCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  5. Fong Tan Jew ex rel. Chin Hong Fun v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. One Din ex rel. One Gock Toon v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API