Miller v. Uhlman
District Court, D. Oregon
In Equity. Suit by Nicholas Miller against William Uhlman, William J. Wanmaker, Ferdinand Goebel, and J. M. Kaufman, partners under the firm name of S. & F. Uhlman, and Chin Toy. On final hearing, on bill and cross-bill by Chin Toy. Decree for cross-complainant.
Read the full summary
In Equity. Suit by Nicholas Miller against William Uhlman, William J. Wanmaker, Ferdinand Goebel, and J. M. Kaufman, partners under the firm name of S. & F. Uhlman, and Chin Toy. On final hearing, on bill and cross-bill by Chin Toy. Decree for cross-complainant. This is a suit instituted by Nicholas Miller against William Uhlman, William J. Wanmaker, Ferdinand Goebel, and J. M. Kaufman, copartners in business under the firm name of S. & F. Uhlman, and Chin Toy, a Chinaman, praying for a decree reforming four certain hop contracts, the same having been entered into on February 24, 1908,…
1Opinion of the CourtWolvkrton, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] From the testimony it would seem that Chin Toy first broached the subject of a contract respecting the production and sale of the hops from the premises held under lease by him from Miller to George H. Benedict, agent of S. & E. Uhlman, along with Gilbertson, who informed him (Toy) that he should have the owner of the premises sign with him. Toy, having indicated that Miller would sign with him, was told to bring Miller over to Aurora to see Gilbertson, and make the necessary arrangements. Miller relates that Gilbertson wrote him to come over to Aurora,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Harper Bros. v. KlawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Young v. CobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Robertson v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Tolin v. Pearce-Simpson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Kemmerer v. Midland Oil & Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.