Legal Opinion

Crossland Inv. Co., Inc. v. Rhodes

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided February 28, 2003No. 4:00CV456-RHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

HINKLE, District Judge.

By this action a real estate broker seeks to recover amounts it would have received as compensation if certain renewal options under a long-term lease had been exercised. The options were not exercised, but the broker says that was the fault of the lessor and those acting in concert with her, who, the broker says, failed to act in good faith, thus defeating the broker’s justifiable expectation that the options would be exercised.

Each side has moved for summary judgment. I conclude that the lessor acted in her own…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Salit v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, SchusterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Tobin & Tobin Insurance Agency, Inc. v. ZeskindDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API