Legal Opinion
Velek v. State of Arkansas
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 6, 2001No. 4:00CV00929 SMRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*662 ORDER
STEPHEN M. REASONER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 10) filed by Plaintiff Timothy P. Cotton (Mr. Cotton). For the following reasons, the motion is denied in its entirety.
First, Plaintiff failed to file a brief accompanying the present motion as required by Local Rule 7.2(e): “Pretrial motions for temporary restraining orders, motions for preliminary injunctions, and motions to dismiss, shall not be taken up and considered unless set forth in a separate pleading accompanied by a separate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HonkenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003