Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Fields

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1939No. 2047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DORE, Judge.

This suit is in the nature of a petitory action, together with a demand for the •cancellation of a contract entered into by plaintiff and defendant wherein plaintiff .agreed to sell and defendant agreed to purchase the property in contest upon certain terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.

Plaintiff ’ alleges that he is the true and lawful owner of the property in contest, having acquired the same by authentic act from the defendant on October 7, 1936; that, shortly thereafter, he entered into a contract to sell the said property to the defendant for the sum of $600,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armorer v. CaseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854
  2. Johnson v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Bridges v. GanttLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Calhoun v. HodgesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Ford v. CohenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fields v. McAdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API