Clark v. Hiatt
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By CONN, J.
Upon the trial of this case in the court of common pleas, the jury *118returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $7,700.00. Judgment was entered on the verdict and defendant appeals to this court.
Plaintiff in his amended petition alleges that he is a minor, 19 years of age and brings this action by Charles A. Clark, his father and next friend.
For cause of action, against defendant, plaintiff says that State Route No. 70 is a public highway running northwest and southeast between Springfield and S. Charleston, Ohio, and for at least four miles southeast of Springfield it is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murphy, Admr. v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Starr v. GebhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1957