Samuel S. Jackson Co. v. Atwood

Heard (1) on respondent’s motion to enjoin complainant’s suit at law against respondent in Massachusetts for the same cause of action; (2) on creditors’ bill and answer.(1) Whether the suit shall be enjoined is within our discretion.

Quidnick Co. vs. Chaffee, 17 R. I. 367 at 387.

Jenks vs. Smith, 14 R. I. 634.

The- facts in the present case, by the decree now on file, show that complainant is adequately protected. He presents no good reason why this bill and his suit iat law should proceed concurrently. Complainant, therefore, until further order of the Court, may be enjoined from prosecution of…