Dahl v. State

RIDGÉLY, Justice:

Defendant-Appellant William S. Dahl appeals his Superior Court conviction of Loitering by a Sex Offender within 500 Feet of a School, 1 specifically a dance academy. Dahl was convicted at a bench trial. Dahl raises three arguments on appeal. First, Dahl contends that his due process rights were violated when the trial judge allowed the prosecutor to amend the indictment on the day of trial to expand by one month the date parameters of the alleged offense. Second, Dahl contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State…