Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Langford

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

This action was brought to restrain the foreclosure by advertisement of a mortgage executed by one Day and wife to defendant Heath, and by him assigned to defendant Lang-ford. Day conveyed the land to plaintiff by warranty deed, representing that it was free from all incumbrances.

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the mem. of opinion:

“We think that the trial court erred in overruling the offer of the plaintiff to prove that the mortgage was given for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of the mortgagor, and upon no other consideration. The plaintiff paid the full value of the land upon the assurance of Day that it was free from incumbrances. Day is dead and his estate is insolvent, and there is no available remedy on the covenants in the deed. If the mortgage was without consideration it could not be enforced against Day although it was given to cover up his property and defraud…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bush v. . LathropNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hill v. . HooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Baird v. BairdNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Devlin v. QuiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Liebowitz v. Arrow Roofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Sparling v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API